Peer Review Process

Jurnal Pengabdian Inovasi Sosial Berkelanjutan applies a double-blind peer review process to maintain objectivity and quality. The identities of both authors and reviewers remain confidential.

The review process begins with an initial editorial check to assess the manuscript’s alignment with the journal’s focus and adherence to submission guidelines. Manuscripts that do not meet the criteria may be rejected or returned for revision before proceeding to the review stage. After passing the initial screening, the manuscript is checked for plagiarism using plagiarism detection software to ensure originality.

Eligible manuscripts are sent to two reviewers with expertise in the relevant field. Reviewers evaluate the manuscript based on originality, relevance, methodology, and societal impact. Based on the review, the editor may decide to accept the manuscript without revision, accept it with minor or major revisions, or reject it.

If revisions are required, authors must make the necessary changes based on the reviewers' feedback within a given timeframe. Revised manuscripts will be re-evaluated before final acceptance. Once approved, the final editing process is completed before online publication.

This journal adheres to the ethical publishing standards set by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) to ensure high academic integrity.